Contents: Difference between revisions

From 2nd Book
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
<noinclude>This is a good page to bookmark as an entry point to the website.</noinclude>
=[[Contents]]=
=[[Contents]]=
{{:Why study this?}}
{{:Why study this?}}

Revision as of 03:07, 7 August 2022

This is a good page to bookmark as an entry point to the website.

Contents

Why study this? []

Discussion

Act of worship
Language of God (Adam)
Know God better
Bible comes alive (The mystery revealed)

2nd book MetaTalk Discussion

Introduction to metatalk
What is the second book? []


Discussion

Paul's 'mystery'
Meat of the gospel

For another time Discussion

Proper sensus plenior of scripture
Proper Quadriga of Catholicism
Proper PaRDeS of Hebrew interpretation
Secret teaching of Jesus
Prophetic riddle sealed
Training manual for the Christ child
God speaks in verifiable ways
Hidden layer of the Bible
2nd book origin
2nd book taught as a mystery
2nd book as the marriage supper of the lamb
2nd book loss
2nd book in Jewish memory
2nd book in Church memory
2nd book rediscovered
2nd book and the fellowship of the mystery

Formation Discussion

Introduction to formation
Strokes (Jots and tittles)
Letters
Formation of gates
Formation of roots
Formation of words []


Introduction to formation of words

Forming gates

Forming roots

Forming compounds

Word studies []

Discussion

Introduction to word studies
Hebrew Dictionary
English index to Hebrew Dictionary
Grammar
Word observations

Systematic theology []


Systematic theologies are men's attempt to formulate orderly, rational, and coherent accounts of the teachings of the Bible. They immediately go off-course being influenced by church history and historical theology; that is... tradition. The academic practice of determining a systematic theology is also influenced by the academic disciplines of dogmatics, ethics, apologetics, and philosophy. It is thoroughly steeped in the works and rationale of men.

How is a systematic theology derived which is absent these influences? The interpretive methods taught by the apostles have no room for human invention, merely observation of self-validating teachings. The rules guiding these observations have been hinted at previously, and will be examined more closely in future discussions. They can be seen in the Rules .

What is left to the interpreter in forming a systematic theology? Merely to organize it and explain the observations so they may be reproduced. This we will endeavor to do.

If we will know what God intends to make known we must start with what he says. The letters of the Hebrew alphabet create the meaning of the words in scripture. The words create the meaning that God intended. Each letter is a metaphor whose meaning is a topic for God's systematic theology. As we observe the explosion of the letter meaning into word meanings and then into theology, it will be apparent that knowledge of the cross is required to discern it.

The cross is the key to interpreting God's intended meaning in the letters, words and doctrine. Formal proofs of the meanings become tedious to read; their consistent use will be sufficient proof that human invention is impossible.

Next Natural catechism

Future topics:

Topical index
Apologetics
Reformed theology compared

Bible studies Discussion

Introduction to Bible studies
Rules for interpretation
Biblical interpretation
The Bible
Children's stories
Index to pericopes
Patterns of prophecy
Topics
Xray studies
Questions

Academic questions []

Discussion

How do we trust this method?
The problem of evil
The Synoptic problem
Q
Mark's extended ending
Missing scripture