7,590
edits
Edible animals: Difference between revisions
From 2nd Book
Jump to navigationJump to search
no edit summary
(Created page with "{{bl| Edible animals }} {{cth| animals }} I have summarized part of the dietary law which speaks of good and bad teachers. Eating is a metaphor for learning. Good: clean animal = his meditation on the word produces a holy walk Bad: Camel - teaches to judge Bad: Coney - legalist who hides the love of the Word Bad: Hare - spiritual drunk who celebrates all religions Bad: Swine - Does not discern what he learns Good: Fish - Lives by the Word and uses it as his defe...") |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 66: | Line 66: | ||
Bad: Four feet - Improperly mix flesh with spirit and holiness with grace. | Bad: Four feet - Improperly mix flesh with spirit and holiness with grace. | ||
Bad: Carries the | Bad: Carries the carcass - exalts the dead flesh | ||
