7,590
edits
Edible animals: Difference between revisions
From 2nd Book
Jump to navigationJump to search
Created page with "{{bl| Edible animals }} {{cth| animals }} I have summarized part of the dietary law which speaks of good and bad teachers. Eating is a metaphor for learning. Good: clean animal = his meditation on the word produces a holy walk Bad: Camel - teaches to judge Bad: Coney - legalist who hides the love of the Word Bad: Hare - spiritual drunk who celebrates all religions Bad: Swine - Does not discern what he learns Good: Fish - Lives by the Word and uses it as his defe..."
(Created page with "{{bl| Edible animals }} {{cth| animals }} I have summarized part of the dietary law which speaks of good and bad teachers. Eating is a metaphor for learning. Good: clean animal = his meditation on the word produces a holy walk Bad: Camel - teaches to judge Bad: Coney - legalist who hides the love of the Word Bad: Hare - spiritual drunk who celebrates all religions Bad: Swine - Does not discern what he learns Good: Fish - Lives by the Word and uses it as his defe...") |
(No difference)
|
