Created for love: Difference between revisions

Created for love (view source)

23 bytes added , 24 March

13,759

edits

@@ Line 60: / Line 60: @@
 '''Controversy:''' Some argue that breaking down words by their letters is not a standard linguistic method and can lead to subjective interpretations.
-'''Response:''' We do not claim that these meanings replace traditional grammar, but rather that they reveal patterns consistent with biblical theology. The Bible itself uses wordplay and acrostic structures (e.g., Psalm 119, Lamentations). Jesus interpreted the Old Testament in ways that astonished the scholars of His day, showing that deeper meanings exist beyond surface-level reading. Our approach aligns with how Scripture unveils hidden truths about Christ (Luke 24:27).
+'''Response:''' We do not claim that these meanings replace traditional grammar, but rather that they reveal patterns consistent with biblical theology. Interpretations using word formations to derive the meaning of the words are less susceptible to subjectivity. Jesus interpreted the Old Testament in ways that astonished the scholars of His day, showing that deeper meanings exist beyond surface-level reading. Our approach aligns with how Scripture unveils hidden truths about Christ (Luke 24:27).
 === '''4. The Bride as the Object of Creation''' ===