9,629
edits
(Created page with "{{blc| Mental difficulty }} Launch: Start by presenting a complex puzzle or problem-solving scenario, such as a mystery that requires connecting seemingly unrelated clues. Ask students to work in small groups to develop a strategy for solving the puzzle, emphasizing the need for critical thinking and collaboration. Socratic Questions: What strategies can we use to break down a complex problem into smaller, more manageable parts? How do we determine which piece...") |
m (Text replacement - " " to ":") |
||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
Socratic Questions: | Socratic Questions: | ||
:What strategies can we use to break down a complex problem into smaller, more manageable parts? | |||
:How do we determine which piece of information is most important when solving a problem? | |||
:What role does persistence play when facing a problem that seems unsolvable at first? | |||
Mystery Puzzle: "The Case of the Missing Artifact" | Mystery Puzzle: "The Case of the Missing Artifact" | ||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
Clues to present: | Clues to present: | ||
:Security footage shows a person wearing a red jacket entering the museum late at night but no one matching the description leaving. | |||
:An anonymous tip suggests the artifact was moved but never left the building. | |||
:The staff schedules reveal that two employees were working in the museum late at night, but neither remembers seeing anything suspicious. | |||
:A set of fingerprints found near the artifact's display, but they don’t match anyone in the current database. | |||
:A hidden compartment was found in a nearby bookshelf with a small piece of the artifact’s packaging, suggesting it was hidden briefly before being moved. | |||
Task: | Task: | ||
Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
Strategy Emphasis: | Strategy Emphasis: | ||
:Breaking down the clues logically and discussing potential connections. | |||
:Considering multiple perspectives on the situation (e.g., motives of different suspects). | |||
:Collaborating and assigning different roles (researcher, theorist, communicator) within each group to effectively analyze the information. | |||
This scenario engages critical thinking, problem-solving, and collaboration, while encouraging students to consider how seemingly unrelated pieces of information can come together to form a solution. | This scenario engages critical thinking, problem-solving, and collaboration, while encouraging students to consider how seemingly unrelated pieces of information can come together to form a solution. |