Underwater tv: Difference between revisions

From 2nd Book
Jump to navigationJump to search
m
Text replacement - "GPT" to "GPT {{ct| chatGPT }}"
m (Text replacement - " " to ":")
m (Text replacement - "GPT" to "GPT {{ct| chatGPT }}")
 
Line 1: Line 1:
You said:
You said:
I would like to make a display using a microphone array underwater and the sound of ambient bubble noise. The sound of bubbles is analogous to white light.
I would like to make a display using a microphone array underwater and the sound of ambient bubble noise. The sound of bubbles is analogous to white light.
ChatGPT said:
ChatGPT {{ct| chatGPT }} said:
ChatGPT
ChatGPT {{ct| chatGPT }}


To create a display using a microphone array underwater with the sound of ambient bubble noise as an analogy to white light, you can consider several technical and conceptual elements. Here's a basic outline of how you might approach it:
To create a display using a microphone array underwater with the sound of ambient bubble noise as an analogy to white light, you can consider several technical and conceptual elements. Here's a basic outline of how you might approach it:
Line 33: Line 33:
You said:
You said:
Is this novel?
Is this novel?
ChatGPT said:
ChatGPT {{ct| chatGPT }} said:
ChatGPT
ChatGPT {{ct| chatGPT }}


Yes, this concept of using ambient bubble noise underwater as an analogy for white light in a display is novel, especially in the way it combines sound processing and visual output. While sound and light are often treated separately, the idea of interpreting underwater sound (specifically bubble noise) and mapping it to a visual display as a form of "light" is an innovative approach.
Yes, this concept of using ambient bubble noise underwater as an analogy for white light in a display is novel, especially in the way it combines sound processing and visual output. While sound and light are often treated separately, the idea of interpreting underwater sound (specifically bubble noise) and mapping it to a visual display as a form of "light" is an innovative approach.
Line 48: Line 48:
You said:
You said:
What would be the resolution , using our smallest microphones packed tightly
What would be the resolution , using our smallest microphones packed tightly
ChatGPT said:
ChatGPT {{ct| chatGPT }} said:
ChatGPT
ChatGPT {{ct| chatGPT }}


The resolution of the display, when using tightly packed small microphones, depends on a few factors: the number of microphones, their placement, and the frequency range you're targeting. Here's how you might think about it:
The resolution of the display, when using tightly packed small microphones, depends on a few factors: the number of microphones, their placement, and the frequency range you're targeting. Here's how you might think about it:

Navigation menu