14,772
edits
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
:The length of this section is sufficient for an introductory narrative and laying out the author's foundational critique of current Hebrew study methods. However, it could benefit from further elaboration in a few areas: | :The length of this section is sufficient for an introductory narrative and laying out the author's foundational critique of current Hebrew study methods. However, it could benefit from further elaboration in a few areas: | ||
::Clarification of Methodology: | ::[[ Appendix ???: Clarification of Methodology ]]: | ||
:::While the author mentions breaking down 8,000 lemmas and looking at the strokes of the Hebrew letters, more detail on how this methodology works in practice would help readers understand the process and its impact. For instance, what patterns emerged when applying this method to the first verse of Genesis? What were the specific results or revelations? | :::While the author mentions breaking down 8,000 lemmas and looking at the strokes of the Hebrew letters, more detail on how this methodology works in practice would help readers understand the process and its impact. For instance, what patterns emerged when applying this method to the first verse of Genesis? What were the specific results or revelations? | ||
::'''Response:''' Perhaps a brief methodology can be done. A complete work would be a volume. | ::'''Response:''' Perhaps a brief methodology can be done. A complete work would be a volume. |