9,701
edits
Talk:The Synoptic Problem: Difference between revisions
From 2nd Book
Jump to navigationJump to search
no edit summary
(Created page with "The paper addresses significant issues in the Synoptic Problem but leaves several critical questions and challenges unresolved. These gaps highlight areas for further exploration: 1. Details of Gospel Relationships Beyond Genre Unresolved: While the paper critiques the Q hypothesis and emphasizes genre and theological intent, it doesn't fully explain the specific relationships between Matthew, Mark, and Luke. For example: Why do they share verbatim passages...") |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Unresolved: While the paper critiques the Q hypothesis and emphasizes genre and theological intent, it doesn't fully explain the specific relationships between Matthew, Mark, and Luke. For example: | Unresolved: While the paper critiques the Q hypothesis and emphasizes genre and theological intent, it doesn't fully explain the specific relationships between Matthew, Mark, and Luke. For example: | ||
:[[ Why do they share verbatim passages if not copying? ]] | |||
How can the theological framework account for both similarities and differences in narrative order and detail? | How can the theological framework account for both similarities and differences in narrative order and detail? | ||
Impact: Without a clear mechanism explaining textual overlap, the critique of Q may seem incomplete to some scholars. | Impact: Without a clear mechanism explaining textual overlap, the critique of Q may seem incomplete to some scholars. | ||
