Examine the Order of Writing: Difference between revisions

From 2nd Book
Jump to navigationJump to search
no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
Line 3: Line 3:
The commonly accepted chronological order of Gospel composition is Mark → Matthew → Luke → John, based on internal evidence, historical testimony, and textual analysis. Here's an analysis of how each Gospel builds upon its predecessor:
The commonly accepted chronological order of Gospel composition is Mark → Matthew → Luke → John, based on internal evidence, historical testimony, and textual analysis. Here's an analysis of how each Gospel builds upon its predecessor:


1. Mark (ca. 65–70 AD)
'''1. Mark (ca. 65–70 AD)'''


Characteristics:
Characteristics:
Line 16: Line 16:
:Simplicity: The Gospel is relatively straightforward, lacking the genealogies, infancy narratives, or deeper theological reflections seen in later Gospels.
:Simplicity: The Gospel is relatively straightforward, lacking the genealogies, infancy narratives, or deeper theological reflections seen in later Gospels.


2. Matthew (ca. 70–85 AD)
'''2. Matthew (ca. 70–85 AD)'''


How It Builds on Mark:
How It Builds on Mark:
Line 34: Line 34:
:Expands Mark’s portrayal of Jesus by presenting Him as the Jewish Messiah and the fulfillment of God’s covenant with Israel.
:Expands Mark’s portrayal of Jesus by presenting Him as the Jewish Messiah and the fulfillment of God’s covenant with Israel.


3. Luke (ca. 80–90 AD)
'''3. Luke (ca. 80–90 AD)'''


How It Builds on Mark and Matthew:
How It Builds on Mark and Matthew:
Line 53: Line 53:
:Reflects an understanding of Jesus’ role as both a prophet and the divine Savior.
:Reflects an understanding of Jesus’ role as both a prophet and the divine Savior.


4. John (ca. 90–100 AD)
'''4. John (ca. 90–100 AD)'''


How It Builds on Synoptic Gospels (Mark, Matthew, and Luke):
How It Builds on Synoptic Gospels (Mark, Matthew, and Luke):

Navigation menu