Proud Atheists humbled: Difference between revisions
(Created page with "{{bl| Proud Atheists humbled }} Despite the attempts of comedian Ricky Gervais to redefine the term, an '''atheist''' is one who denies the existence of God, or of a supreme intelligent being, not just one who does not believe. It is not simply 'not believing'. It is the truth claim that here is no God. He capitalizes on the common Jesuit lie that there is no proof for God. So he claims that atheists are reasonable people who have not been presented with enough proof....") |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
A true atheist is first a liar. One cannot know for sure there is no God unless he has searched everywhere simultaneously for him, since he may move or actively hide from him. He would have to be omnipresent, himself, or be God, to know there was no other God. | A true atheist is first a liar. One cannot know for sure there is no God unless he has searched everywhere simultaneously for him, since he may move or actively hide from him. He would have to be omnipresent, himself, or be God, to know there was no other God. | ||
If the verses above were written by men, why would they confuse the knowledge of God with accusations of abominations. Those are different subjects, belief versus known behaviors. Because God is God, he also knows that there is no other God, and that those who make the truth claim that there is no God, have already done abominations. | |||
Why is Ricky so actively opposing God these days as many abominations are coming to light? | |||
It is not disbelief that makes one an atheist, but the lie that he knows there is no God. | It is not disbelief that makes one an atheist, but the lie that he knows there is no God. | ||
Revision as of 09:34, 23 December 2023
Despite the attempts of comedian Ricky Gervais to redefine the term, an atheist is one who denies the existence of God, or of a supreme intelligent being, not just one who does not believe.
It is not simply 'not believing'. It is the truth claim that here is no God. He capitalizes on the common Jesuit lie that there is no proof for God. So he claims that atheists are reasonable people who have not been presented with enough proof. God says otherwise:
▸ ± Ps 14:1 The fool hath said in his heart, [There is] no God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, [there is] none that doeth good.
▸ ± Ps 53:1 The fool hath said in his heart, [There is] no God. Corrupt are they, and have done abominable iniquity: [there is] none that doeth good.
The nearly identical repetition tells us that the atheist has sinned in flesh and spirit.
If one says, "I don't know..." then he is not an atheist, but one who does not acknowledge God as God.
A true atheist is first a liar. One cannot know for sure there is no God unless he has searched everywhere simultaneously for him, since he may move or actively hide from him. He would have to be omnipresent, himself, or be God, to know there was no other God.
If the verses above were written by men, why would they confuse the knowledge of God with accusations of abominations. Those are different subjects, belief versus known behaviors. Because God is God, he also knows that there is no other God, and that those who make the truth claim that there is no God, have already done abominations.
Why is Ricky so actively opposing God these days as many abominations are coming to light?
It is not disbelief that makes one an atheist, but the lie that he knows there is no God.
