Introduction ( Letters to Doubting Thomas ): Difference between revisions

(Created page with "{{bl| Introduction ( Letters to Doubting Thomas ) }} {{sp|2}}OP: Are there proofs in philosophy? {{sp|2}}OPA: No. But we use reasoning for guidance.")
 
No edit summary
 
(5 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{bl| Introduction ( Letters to Doubting Thomas ) }}
{{bl| Introduction ( Letters to Doubting Thomas ) }}


{{sp|2}}OP: Are there proofs in philosophy?
<ol>
{{sp|2}}OPA: No. But we use reasoning for guidance.
<li>OP: Are there proofs in philosophy?</li>
<li>OPA: No. But we use reasoning for guidance.</li>
<ol type= "a">
<li>Purpose is to persuade ourselves.</li>
<li>We hold controversial positions on other things. </li>
<li>Double standard for religion</li>
<li>Makes a clearer understanding</li>
</ol>
</ol>
<ol>
<li>What is 'argument-to-the-best-explation'?</li>
<ol type="a">
<li>Phenomenon needs explained</li>
<li>Restatement of Occam's razor - consider prior probability</li>
<ol type="">Three types of explanations:
<li>
 
 
 
</ol>

Latest revision as of 12:29, 17 February 2024

Introduction ( Letters to Doubting Thomas ) []


  1. OP: Are there proofs in philosophy?
  2. OPA: No. But we use reasoning for guidance.
    1. Purpose is to persuade ourselves.
    2. We hold controversial positions on other things.
    3. Double standard for religion
    4. Makes a clearer understanding
  1. What is 'argument-to-the-best-explation'?
    1. Phenomenon needs explained
    2. Restatement of Occam's razor - consider prior probability
      1. Three types of explanations: