7,584
edits
Different Hebrew: Difference between revisions
From 2nd Book
Jump to navigationJump to search
no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
{{ct| Hermeneutics }}{{ct| Gospels }} | {{ct| Hermeneutics }}{{ct| Gospels }} | ||
A "scholar" suggested that we dare not use Easton because it is so old. He said it cannot be trusted. "Back then", he said, "they didn't even know that Chaldee, Aramaic, and Hebrew were three different languages." | A "scholar" suggested that we dare not use Easton because it is so old. He said it cannot be trusted. "Back then", he said, "they didn't even know that Chaldee, Aramaic, and Hebrew were three different languages." "7. | ||
Connection between Chaldean, Syriac, and Samaritan as "Aramaic language" was first identified in 1679 by German theologian Johann Wilhelm Hilliger. " https://www.factsnippet.com/site/facts-about-aramaic-language.html | |||
I picked up a new seminary text book on Hebrew 101. The author somewhere discovered that there are 23 letters in Hebrew alphabet. Fro hundreds of years we have been told that there are 22; 27 if you count final forms separately. By formation, there are 28. The author decided that the 'sin' and 'shin' are two letters, even though they have the same numeric value of 21. | I picked up a new seminary text book on Hebrew 101. The author somewhere discovered that there are 23 letters in Hebrew alphabet. Fro hundreds of years we have been told that there are 22; 27 if you count final forms separately. By formation, there are 28. The author decided that the 'sin' and 'shin' are two letters, even though they have the same numeric value of 21. | ||
