7,584
edits
Great herb: Difference between revisions
From 2nd Book
Jump to navigationJump to search
no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
The [[Rules for interpretation]] <ref>[[Rules for interpretation]]</ref> were applied to clarify the teaching. Scripture is the source of all the answers. Not our memory, doctrinal interpolations, tradition, history, etc. | The [[Rules for interpretation]] <ref>[[Rules for interpretation]]</ref> were applied to clarify the teaching. Scripture is the source of all the answers. Not our memory, doctrinal interpolations, tradition, history, etc. | ||
A child could have noticed that originally it was said that the herbs were given to man to ''''eat''', but that the scripture did not say that. Where did it come from? It wasn't a total fabrication. Everyone knows that herbs can be eaten. So it was 'penciled in' in our mind to make sense of the riddle as it was examined more closely in each pass. | A child could have noticed that originally it was said that the herbs were given to man to ''''eat''', but that the scripture did not say that. Where did it come from? It wasn't a total fabrication. Everyone knows that herbs can be eaten. So it was 'penciled in' in our mind to make sense of the riddle as it was examined more closely in each pass. It wasn't heretically wrong, it just wasn't precise; which further digging corrected. | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{1c| | {{1c| | ||
