Library: Exercise: Einstein vs. Edison

From 2nd Book
Revision as of 16:14, 8 July 2024 by Pig (talk | contribs) (→‎1)
Jump to navigationJump to search

Library: Exercise: Einstein vs. Edison []

1

1. Read the article Would You Pass Thomas Edison’s Employment Test? [1]

[p 1][p 2][p 3][p 4][p 5][p 6][p 7][p 8][p 9][p 10][p 11]

1.1.Vote <1 : Do you retain all facts you have ever learned?
1.2. Discuss <5 : How would you know if you have forgotten something?
1.3. Research ? : What is the difference between reasoning and intelligence?[verify 1]

[verify 2][verify 3]

1.4. Analyze categorize : Identify questions on the test as requiring knowledge, reasoning, or intelligence.

[verify 4]

1.5.Vote  : Is the Edison test worth attempting to pass vs. Is it a waste of time?
1.6. Discuss ? :
1.7. Analyze evaluate : Are there things on the test the are worth memorizing? If so, add them to your I want to memorize diary .

[verify 5]

This is probably enough for one day

2

2. Read the National Park Service review of Edison. [2] Template:Web article
2.1. Discuss :There are two sides to the 'Edison story'. What motivation did the ones telling the story have?
2.2. Analyze :Would you prefer that your life be reviewed by the press or the park service?
2.3. Edison said of his employees: "not the money they want, but the chance for their ambition to work."
2.3.1. Discuss  : Is it fair that the more you like your job, the less you should get paid?
2.3.2. Discuss  : Is that Edison's trade off with his employees?
2.3.3. Discuss  : What else did Edison offer besides a job they liked?
2.3.4. Analyze evaluate : Is there a skill or ability that you would like to learn and would take a lower pay, just to learn it?
2.3.5. Analyze evaluate : Is there a company you would work for at a lower rate, just to be able to say you worked there?

3

3. Einstein and Edison were geniuses who saw things differently and did things differently.
3.1. Research 15 : What products did each produce. These may or may not give sufficient information.
3.1.1. https://www.history.com/topics/inventions/thomas-edison
3.1.2. https://www.history.com/topics/inventions/albert-einstein
3.2. Research 10 : How many people did each employ?
3.3. Analyze evaluate : How did each change the world?
3.4. Discuss  : Which model do you prefer?

4

You have examined concepts of intelligence, reasoning, and learning. No doubt we all use all three. We usually use them naturally. The purpose of these exercises was to help you explore when to intentionally memorize, or to access another resource.

4.1. Discuss  : Give an example of a subject where you remember many facts about it. This is sometimes called 'domain knowledge' in industry. A welder is expected to know inspection methods, plan reading, safety procedures. These are not things you want your welder to have to look up. However, he might look up material properties, and specifications.
4.2. Discuss  : Name one career you might be interested in.
You likely have not chosen a career. For the sake of discussion, name one of interest to you, and the kinds of things you would want to memorize and those things that are available in other resources.
4.3. Discuss  : How do you decide when to memorize, or when to use books?
4.4. Before calculators were invented, engineers used to memorize pi to 8 or 16 digits (3.1415926535897932). They did this just because they used it often. Other resources now extend our memory.
4.4.1. Research  : Other memory extenders.
4.4.2. Analyze categorize : Categorize your list by the kind of information and how it is accessed.
4.5. Display - {{{2}}}: What have you learned about memory extensions.

References

Review

  1. 1.3.v Research ? : What is the difference between reasoning and intelligence?
  2. 1.3.v.1 There are definitions with sources.
  3. 1.3.v.2 There is evidence of analysis:contrast
  4. 1.4.v Copy of test marked up with tags. Dialog if you spot some that don't make sense to the reviewer.
  5. 1.7.v Ask if the hero would like to share added items.


Cite error: <ref> tags exist for a group named "p", but no corresponding <references group="p"/> tag was found