No scripture in Paleo-Hebrew: Difference between revisions

From 2nd Book
Jump to navigationJump to search
(Created page with "{{bl| No scripture in Paleo-Hebrew }} {{th}} {{1c| Tradition holds that there was no scripture written in Paleo-Hebrew (PH). The evidence bears this out; Scholars had to transliterate Square-text to Paleo-Hebrew. <ref>https://archive.org/details/PaleoHebrewScriptures_201312/page/n635/mode/2up</ref> }} {{1c| There is no "kosher style-guide" for PH. The language was not considered sacred. The artifacts that have been found concern daily activities such as receipts, etc....")
 
No edit summary
Line 6: Line 6:
{{1c|
{{1c|
There is no "kosher style-guide" for PH.  The language was not considered sacred. The artifacts that have been found concern daily activities such as receipts, etc. They did not consider it important to maintain it's 'purity'.  
There is no "kosher style-guide" for PH.  The language was not considered sacred. The artifacts that have been found concern daily activities such as receipts, etc. They did not consider it important to maintain it's 'purity'.  
}}
{{1c|
PH are allegorical interpretations of the names of the square-text (ST).
:aleph
:: PH: bull
:: ST: the unspeakable name of God, the Trinity,  God א taught ל in riddles of the cross ף,
}}
}}

Revision as of 06:54, 3 September 2022

No scripture in Paleo-Hebrew []

Discussion

Tradition holds that there was no scripture written in Paleo-Hebrew (PH). The evidence bears this out; Scholars had to transliterate Square-text to Paleo-Hebrew. [1]

There is no "kosher style-guide" for PH. The language was not considered sacred. The artifacts that have been found concern daily activities such as receipts, etc. They did not consider it important to maintain it's 'purity'.

PH are allegorical interpretations of the names of the square-text (ST).

aleph
PH: bull
ST: the unspeakable name of God, the Trinity, God א taught ל in riddles of the cross ף,