Notarikon is not eisegesis: Difference between revisions

From 2nd Book
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{bl| Notarikon is not eisegesis }}
{{bl| Notarikon is not eisegesis }}


{[th}}
{{th}}
{{1c|  
{{1c|  
'Eisegesis' is placing your own opinions back into the text.
'Eisegesis' is placing your own opinions back into the text.
Line 9: Line 9:
}}
}}
{{1c|
{{1c|
This author is accused of imposing meaning where none exists
[[This author accused og eisegesis]]
}}
}}
{{1c|
{{1c|
The Rules demonstrate that the notarikon is}}
The Rules demonstrate that the notarikon is
}}
|}
|}

Revision as of 06:37, 16 November 2022

Notarikon is not eisegesis []


Discussion

'Eisegesis' is placing your own opinions back into the text.

Jesus accused of eisegesis

This author accused og eisegesis

The Rules demonstrate that the notarikon is