Notarikon is not eisegesis: Difference between revisions

From 2nd Book
Jump to navigationJump to search
(Created page with "{{bl| Notarikon is not eisegesis }} {[th}} {{1c| 'Eisegesis' is placing your own opinions back into the text. }} {{1c| Jesus is accused by some, of reading himself into the Old Testament. }} {{1c| This author is accused of imposing meaning where none exists }} {{1c| The Rules demonstrate that the notarikon is")
 
No edit summary
Line 6: Line 6:
}}
}}
{{1c|  
{{1c|  
Jesus is accused by some, of reading himself into the Old Testament.
[[Jesus accused of eisegesis]]
}}
}}
{{1c|
{{1c|
Line 15: Line 15:


{{1c|
{{1c|
The Rules demonstrate that the notarikon is
The Rules demonstrate that the notarikon is}}
|}

Revision as of 06:35, 16 November 2022

Notarikon is not eisegesis []


{[th}} | 'Eisegesis' is placing your own opinions back into the text.

| |- | Jesus accused of eisegesis

| |- | This author is accused of imposing meaning where none exists

| |-


| The Rules demonstrate that the notarikon is | |- |}