No scripture in Paleo-Hebrew: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{bl| No scripture in Paleo-Hebrew }} | {{bl| No scripture in Paleo-Hebrew }} | ||
{{th}} | {{th}} | ||
{{1c| | {{1c| | ||
There is no "kosher style-guide" for PH. The language was not considered sacred. The artifacts that have been found concern daily activities such as receipts, etc. They did not consider it important to maintain it's 'purity'. | There is no "kosher style-guide" for PH. The language was not considered sacred. The artifacts that have been found concern daily activities such as receipts, etc. They did not consider it important to maintain it's 'purity'. | ||
| Line 21: | Line 18: | ||
:zayin - kind, prostitute | :zayin - kind, prostitute | ||
::PH: Plow, weapon, cut off. <ref>'Plow' is a euphemism for intimacy with a prostitute see Samson's riddle</ref> <ref>The PH symbol is plausibly interpreted as sex</ref> Plow - the seed, fish | ::PH: Plow, weapon, cut off. <ref>'Plow' is a euphemism for intimacy with a prostitute see Samson's riddle</ref> <ref>The PH symbol is plausibly interpreted as sex</ref> Plow - the seed, fish | ||
::ST: bride ז of the son of man through his death ן. | ::ST: bride ז of the son of man through his death ן. <ref>The bride of God was unknown to the Jews, but was hidden in the ST. The creators of PH demonstrate no knowledge of the mystery. | ||
The PH is not rich enough to sustain the mystery. | The PH is not rich enough to sustain the mystery. The mystery was lost when PH was created. It requires belief in magic knowledge to say that the mystery was added when the ST was formed, and as such is a hostility against the scriptures. | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{1c| | {{1c| | ||
| Line 36: | Line 33: | ||
God gave a blessing and a birthright. It is plausible that the tablets were part of the birthright? | God gave a blessing and a birthright. It is plausible that the tablets were part of the birthright? | ||
}} | |||
|} | |} | ||
Latest revision as of 11:19, 3 September 2022
No scripture in Paleo-Hebrew [∞]
|
There is no "kosher style-guide" for PH. The language was not considered sacred. The artifacts that have been found concern daily activities such as receipts, etc. They did not consider it important to maintain it's 'purity'. |
|
|
PH are allegorical interpretations of the names of the square-text (ST).
The PH is not rich enough to sustain the mystery. The mystery was lost when PH was created. It requires belief in magic knowledge to say that the mystery was added when the ST was formed, and as such is a hostility against the scriptures. |
|
|
The PH are pictographs which are subjective to determine meaning. The ST letters get meaning from the strokes and so are validates both from the strokes and the words they are found in. |
|
|
It is claimed that the Hebrews did not use the ST until the captivity because it is not found in archeology before then. However, there is a good reason they are not found before then. They were not in common use. Being considered to be of divine origin, the original tablets using ST passed from Father to Son from Adam surviving the floood with Noah, and preserved through Babel until they reached the library of Pharaoh with Joseph. Moses carried them into the desert on papyrus, then put them with the arc in the tabernacle; then into the temple. When they were taken into captivity, the sacred things were made common by the enemy king. He gave parties using the temple cups, he made the scriptures common. It is there that the square text is found because their captors humiliated them by making their divine letters profane. God gave a blessing and a birthright. It is plausible that the tablets were part of the birthright? |
