7,587
edits
The Synoptic Problem: Difference between revisions
From 2nd Book
Jump to navigationJump to search
no edit summary
(Created page with "{{bl| The Synoptic Problem }} When you read the four Gospels: Mark, Matthew, Luke and John, the first thing you notice is that Matthew, Mark, and Luke are similar in telling a sequential story of Christ and John is very different. John seems to speak mystically or thematically, where the others appear to speak literally of the life of Christ. Scholars set aside John to compare the other three to each other. Written in the order of Mark, Matthew, Luke, scholars debate...") |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
They invent even more hostilities with their invention. If Q was an authoritative document that no longer exists, then God could not protect his word. Furthermore, since the gospel writers did not 'copy' it the same way, or corrected it, they did not see it as authoritative. | They invent even more hostilities with their invention. If Q was an authoritative document that no longer exists, then God could not protect his word. Furthermore, since the gospel writers did not 'copy' it the same way, or corrected it, they did not see it as authoritative. | ||
All these 'problems' disappear by identifying the proper historical context and genre. | |||
