Notarikon is not eisegesis: Difference between revisions
From 2nd Book
Jump to navigationJump to search
(Created page with "{{bl| Notarikon is not eisegesis }} {[th}} {{1c| 'Eisegesis' is placing your own opinions back into the text. }} {{1c| Jesus is accused by some, of reading himself into the Old Testament. }} {{1c| This author is accused of imposing meaning where none exists }} {{1c| The Rules demonstrate that the notarikon is") |
No edit summary |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{bl| Notarikon is not eisegesis }} | {{bl| Notarikon is not eisegesis }} | ||
{ | {{th}} | ||
{{1c| | {{1c| | ||
'Eisegesis' is placing your own opinions back into the text. | 'Eisegesis' is placing your own opinions back into the text. | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{1c| | {{1c| | ||
Jesus | [[Jesus accused of eisegesis]] | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{1c| | {{1c| | ||
This author | [[This author accused of eisegesis]] | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{1c| | {{1c| | ||
[[Rules constrain eisegesis]] | |||
}} | |||
|} | |||
Latest revision as of 06:37, 16 November 2022
Notarikon is not eisegesis [∞]
|
'Eisegesis' is placing your own opinions back into the text. |
|
