Language of God (Adam): Difference between revisions

From 2nd Book
Jump to navigationJump to search
(Created page with "{{bl| Language of God (Adam) }} {{th}} {{1c| {{:Adam is from the Ground}} }} {{1c| {{:Notarikon is not a novelty}} }} {{1c| {{:Notarikon is not anachronistic}} }} {{1c| {{:The alphabet is God's plan before the beginning}} }} {{1c| {{:The toledoth}} }} |}")
 
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{bl| Language of God (Adam) }}
{{bl| Language of God (Adam) }}
{{th}}
{{th}}
{{1c| {{:Adam is from the Ground}} }}
{{1c| {{:Adam is from the Ground }} }}
{{1c| {{:Notarikon is not a novelty}} }}
{{1c| {{:Notarikon is not a novelty }} }}
{{1c| {{:Notarikon is not anachronistic}} }}
{{1c| {{:Notarikon is not eisegesis }} }}
{{1c| {{:The alphabet is God's plan before the beginning}} }}
{{1c| {{:The alphabet is God's plan before the beginning }} }}
{{1c| {{:The toledoth}} }}
{{1c| {{:The toledoth }} }}
|}
|}

Revision as of 07:24, 16 November 2022

Language of God (Adam) []

Discussion

Adam is from the Ground
Notarikon is not a novelty—it is a key to understanding how God embedded meaning into the very fabric of Hebrew, revealing the depth of His Word.
Notarikon is not eisegesis []


Notarikon Is Not Eisegesis [∞]

Many assume that drawing meaning from letters and word formations in Scripture is eisegesis—the act of imposing personal interpretation onto the text. But true Notarikon is not eisegesis; it is the unveiling of what God has already placed in His Word, following the patterns He established.

Discussion: Understanding Eisegesis

📖 Eisegesis occurs when someone reads their own ideas into the text rather than drawing meaning from the text itself. It distorts Scripture by making it say what we want, rather than what God has said.

Jesus Was Accused of Eisegesis

Jesus Himself faced accusations of twisting Scripture when He revealed deeper meanings hidden in the Law and the Prophets. The religious leaders resisted His unveiling of the second telling because it was already there, yet they had not seen it (Luke 24:27, John 5:39).

This Author Accused of Eisegesis

Likewise, some may accuse those who study Notarikon of reading too much into the text. However, the patterns in Scripture are not inventions—they are discovered, not imposed.

Rules That Restrain Eisegesis

True biblical interpretation follows rules to prevent eisegesis. These include:

  • Patterns established by God within Scripture itself.
  • Validation by multiple witnesses (Deuteronomy 19:15, 2 Corinthians 13:1).
  • Agreement with the overall revelation of Christ—the fulfillment of all Scripture.

Notarikon is not the forcing of hidden meanings—it is the unveiling of what was always there, just as Jesus did on the road to Emmaus. To see more deeply is not to alter the Word, but to hear it more fully.

Jesus accused of eisegesis
This author accused of eisegesis
Rules constrain eisegesis
ELTB Before the beginning []


The Wiseman Hypothesis and the Hidden Picture of Christ

The Wiseman Hypothesis, also known as the Tablet Theory, suggests that Genesis was originally written on clay tablets by the eyewitnesses of its events, with each tablet signed off using the phrase "These are the generations of..." (תולדות, toledot). According to this view, Moses did not compose Genesis from scratch, but carefully copied these ancient clay tablets word for word onto papyrus, preserving them exactly as they were recorded.

Rather than being a challenge to divine inspiration, this view actually reinforces it: God guided the original authors just as He did every other Old Testament writer, ensuring that hidden within the text was a prophetic picture of Christ.


Key Points of the Hypothesis

  1. Moses Copied Word-for-Word from Clay Tablets
    • The repeated phrase "These are the generations of..." is structured like a colophon, a common ancient Mesopotamian signature marking the end of a clay tablet.
    • This suggests that Genesis was originally recorded in separate documents by individuals such as Adam, Noah, Shem, and Abraham.
    • Moses, under divine guidance, transferred these texts verbatim onto papyrus, keeping their original form intact while structuring them into a single, cohesive book.
  2. God Guided the Original Authors to Conceal a Prophetic Narrative
    • Each writer recorded real historical events, but God Himself embedded hidden patterns, symbols, and word structures that foreshadowed Christ.
    • This follows the same pattern as later biblical prophecy:
      • David wrote the Psalms, yet they contain hidden Messianic prophecies (Psalm 22).
      • The prophets wrote about Israel, yet their words pointed to Christ (Isaiah 53).
      • Genesis records early history, yet its structure, word choices, and events all contain prophetic shadows of Christ.
  3. Genesis is Not an Oral Tradition but a Preserved Written Record
    • Unlike the Documentary Hypothesis, which claims Genesis came from late oral traditions, this hypothesis affirms that Genesis was written down from the very beginning.
    • The presence of colophons indicates a strong historical and literary continuity, showing that the Bible’s earliest records were not passed down by word of mouth, but carefully preserved in writing from the start.
    • Moses did not edit or alter the text—he faithfully copied it, preserving even details that may have seemed obscure or unnecessary at the time.

Addressing Objections from the Perspective of Sensus Plenior

  1. "No Genesis Tablets Have Been Found" The lack of physical evidence for Genesis tablets is not a problem from the perspective of sensus plenior, because:
    • Scripture itself testifies to its own accuracy, and the structure of Genesis confirms it was recorded in a manner consistent with ancient writing methods.
    • Many clay tablets from ancient times have not survived—but this does not mean they never existed.
    • More importantly, God’s primary purpose was not to preserve the physical tablets but to preserve the hidden revelation of Christ within the text.
  2. "Is This Just a Historical Hypothesis? What About Christ?" This hypothesis strengthens the sensus plenior view because:
    • Genesis was designed from the beginning to contain prophetic patterns of Christ.
    • If Moses copied the tablets exactly, this means the prophetic riddles hidden within Genesis were not added later but embedded in the earliest records of Scripture, authored by God Himself through human writers.
    • This aligns with Proverbs 25:2“It is the glory of God to conceal a thing: but the honour of kings is to search out a matter.” The hidden picture of Christ was there from the beginning, waiting to be uncovered.
    • The better explains where Moses got content for it it; rather than oral tradition or borrowing text from documents that have disappeared.

Conclusion: Genesis as a Divine Record, Not a Human Invention

The Wiseman Hypothesis, far from undermining Genesis, actually strengthens our confidence in its divine origin. It reveals that:

  1. Genesis was written down by eyewitnesses from the beginning, not developed later through oral tradition.
  2. Moses, under divine inspiration, preserved the original words of these tablets, copying them word-for-word onto papyrus.
  3. God guided the original authors just as He did every other Old Testament writer, embedding in their words a hidden, prophetic message that reveals Christ.
  4. The structure, names, and events of Genesis were not randomly recorded—they were divinely designed to tell the story of Christ in a concealed form.

This aligns Genesis with the rest of Scripture, where literal history contains a deeper spiritual truth, and every word points to Christ.