Teaser - Ancient Hebrew: Difference between revisions

From 2nd Book
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{bl| Teaser - Ancient Hebrew}}
{{bl| Teaser - Ancient Hebrew}}


I am not referring to Paleo-Hebrew, but to the square text. Paleo-Hebrew does not possess the characteristics that will be demonstrated in the square text.
I am not referring to Paleo-Hebrew <ref>[[Paleo-Hebrew]]</ref>, but to the square text. Paleo-Hebrew does not possess the characteristics that will be demonstrated in the square text.


If it is not apparent to you, the world and academia are hostile to God. Sometimes they are openly hostile. They are always subtly hostile.  As I address this issue in other places they will collect in the Category <ref>[[Category: Hostilities]]</ref>
It used to be believed that the Hebrew square test was the language of God. But modern theologians and "scholars" who are hostile <ref>[[:Category: Hostilities]]</ref> to God have persuaded many that the Hebrews wrote their most sacred texts in the language of their enemies while in captivity.  This is utter nonsense on it's face.
 
[[Category: Hostilities]]

Latest revision as of 06:14, 3 September 2022

Teaser - Ancient Hebrew []


I am not referring to Paleo-Hebrew [1], but to the square text. Paleo-Hebrew does not possess the characteristics that will be demonstrated in the square text.

It used to be believed that the Hebrew square test was the language of God. But modern theologians and "scholars" who are hostile [2] to God have persuaded many that the Hebrews wrote their most sacred texts in the language of their enemies while in captivity. This is utter nonsense on it's face.