Collatz conjecture

From 2nd Book
Revision as of 09:15, 20 December 2024 by Pig (talk | contribs) (Replaced content with "== Proof of Predictability == To prove the **predictability** of the Collatz conjecture, we demonstrate that for any starting number \( n \), we can predict when the sequence will produce a number smaller than \( n \). This involves analyzing the transformations \( n \to \frac{n}{2} \) (for even numbers) and \( n \to \frac{3n + 1}{2} \) (for odd numbers). === Step 1: Transformation Behavior === ==== Case 1: \( n \) is even ==== When \( n \) is even: \[ n \to \frac...")
Jump to navigationJump to search

Proof of Predictability

To prove the **predictability** of the Collatz conjecture, we demonstrate that for any starting number \( n \), we can predict when the sequence will produce a number smaller than \( n \). This involves analyzing the transformations \( n \to \frac{n}{2} \) (for even numbers) and \( n \to \frac{3n + 1}{2} \) (for odd numbers).

Step 1: Transformation Behavior

Case 1: \( n \) is even

When \( n \) is even: \[ n \to \frac{n}{2} \] This transformation immediately produces a smaller number because division by 2 reduces the magnitude of any positive integer \( n > 1 \).

Case 2: \( n \) is odd

When \( n \) is odd: \[ n \to \frac{3n + 1}{2} \] The result may be larger or smaller than \( n \), depending on the value of \( n \). For predictability, we aim to identify **when the sequence will drop below the initial value**.

Step 2: Predicting a Smaller Value

The sequence alternates between odd and even numbers after each transformation:

  1. If \( n \) is odd, apply \( n \to \frac{3n + 1}{2} \).
  2. If the result is even, repeatedly apply \( n \to \frac{n}{2} \) until another odd number is reached.

To predict when the sequence reaches a number smaller than \( n \), consider the "weight" of \( n \), defined by how many times it can be divided by 2 after any application of \( \frac{3n + 1}{2} \).

Key Observation

For a given number \( n \), the smallest number produced in its sequence depends on the number of times \( n \) (or subsequent terms) can be divided by 2.

Step 3: Formulating the Predictability Rule

To predict when the sequence produces a smaller number, calculate: \[ k = \text{the highest power of 2 that divides } (n-1) \] This works because:

  1. The transformation \( n \to \frac{3n + 1}{2} \) introduces a factor of 3 and adds 1.
  2. Subtracting 1 from \( n \) aligns the number with the modular behavior of powers of 2, allowing deterministic prediction of when the sequence drops below \( n \).

Example

  • For \( n = 7 \):
 * \( n - 1 = 6 \), and the highest power of 2 dividing 6 is \( 2^1 = 2 \).
 * The sequence for 7 will reach a smaller number after **1 division by 2**.
  • For \( n = 15 \):
 * \( n - 1 = 14 \), and the highest power of 2 dividing 14 is \( 2^1 = 2 \).
 * The sequence for 15 will similarly reach a smaller number after **1 division by 2**.

Step 4: Exponential Reduction

Each transformation reduces the size of the number set exponentially:

  1. Even numbers are solved immediately.
  2. Odd numbers are transformed and alternate between odd/even, with predictable reductions through divisions by 2.
  3. The sequence becomes smaller at a predictable rate based on the modular properties of \( n - 1 \).

Conclusion

Predictability is proven because:

  1. Every \( n \) eventually produces a smaller number.
  2. The specific step where this happens can be calculated directly from \( n - 1 \).