Introduction ( Letters to Doubting Thomas ): Difference between revisions

From 2nd Book
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 4: Line 4:
<li>OP: Are there proofs in philosophy?</li>
<li>OP: Are there proofs in philosophy?</li>
<li>OPA: No. But we use reasoning for guidance.</li>
<li>OPA: No. But we use reasoning for guidance.</li>
<ol>
<ol type= "a">
<li>Purpose is to persuade ourselves.</li>
<li>Purpose is to persuade ourselves.</li>
<li>We hold controversial positions on other things. </li>
<li>We hold controversial positions on other things. </li>
<li></li>
<li>Double standard for religion</li>
<li>Makes a clearer understanding</li>
</ol>
</ol>
</ol>
<ol>
<li>What is 'argument-to-the-best-explation'?</li>
<ol type="a">
<li>Phenomenon needs explained</li>
<li>Restatement of Occam's razor - consider prior probability</li>
<ol type="">Three types of explanations:
<li>
</ol>
</ol>

Latest revision as of 11:29, 17 February 2024

Introduction ( Letters to Doubting Thomas ) [∞]


  1. OP: Are there proofs in philosophy?
  2. OPA: No. But we use reasoning for guidance.
    1. Purpose is to persuade ourselves.
    2. We hold controversial positions on other things.
    3. Double standard for religion
    4. Makes a clearer understanding
  1. What is 'argument-to-the-best-explation'?
    1. Phenomenon needs explained
    2. Restatement of Occam's razor - consider prior probability
        3. Three types of explanations:
Retrieved from "https://2ndbook.org/w/index.php?title=Introduction_(_Letters_to_Doubting_Thomas_)&oldid=7871"