Trusting the priesthood: Difference between revisions

From 2nd Book
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(16 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{bl|Trusting the priesthood}}
{{bl|Trusting the priesthood}}
 
{{th}}
Greeks trust the 'priesthood' or self-appointed experts. Scholars quote others scholars endlessly, and it would seem that their invented issues solved by the doctoral theses wend themselves into the mythology of the church.
{{1c|
 
Greeks trust the 'priesthood' or self-appointed experts. Scholars quote others scholars endlessly, and it would seem that their invented issues solved by their doctoral theses naming each other, wend themselves into the mythology of the church.
:The debates concerning 'sensus plenior' during the last century concluded with a whimpering confession that they could not read the Old Testament the way the Jesus and the NT authors did; wondering if they would ever understand. Can you trust those who admit that the y cannot read the Bible properly? How did they become the priests of Evangelicalism? A prominent 'theologian' from Dallas said. "I will not look at something that is not there, when presented with evidence of the mystery. <ref>{{bgw|Pr 18:13}}  He that answereth a matter before he heareth [it], it [is] folly and shame unto him. [{answereth … : Heb. returneth a word }]</ref>
}}
 
{{1c|
Here we say that all are under the scrutiny of scripture and the rules for interpretation<ref>[[Rules for Interpretation]]</ref>. Even a child may challenge an interpreation under the rules. <ref>{{{bgw|Isa 11:6}}  The wolf also shall dwell with the lamb, and the leopard shall lie down with the kid; and the calf and the young lion and the fatling together; and a little child shall lead them.</ref>
:The debates concerning 'sensus plenior' during the last century concluded with a whimpering confession that they could not read the Old Testament the way the Jesus and the NT authors did; wondering if they would ever understand. Can you trust those who admit that they cannot read the Bible properly? How did they become the priests of Evangelicalism? A prominent 'theologian' from Dallas said, while refusing to look, "I will not look at something that is not there, when presented with evidence of the mystery. <ref>{{bgw|Pr 18:13}}  He that answereth a matter before he heareth [it], it [is] folly and shame unto him. [{answereth … : Heb. returneth a word }]</ref>
}}
{{1c|
Here we say that all are under the scrutiny of scripture and the rules for interpretation<ref>[[Rules for interpretation]]</ref>. Scholars are not apostles! <ref>{{bgw|1Co 1:27}}  But God hath chosen the foolish things of the world to confound the wise; and God hath chosen the weak things of the world to confound the things which are mighty;</ref> But even a child may challenge an interpretation under the rules. <ref>{{{bgw|Isa 11:6}}  The wolf also shall dwell with the lamb, and the leopard shall lie down with the kid; and the calf and the young lion and the fatling together; and '''a little child shall lead them'''.</ref> <ref>{{bgw|Mr 10:15}}  Verily I say unto you, Whosoever shall not receive the kingdom of God as a little child, he shall not enter therein.</ref> <ref>{{bgw|Lu 18:17}}  Verily I say unto you, Whosoever shall not receive the kingdom of God as a little child shall in no wise enter therein.</ref>}}
|}

Latest revision as of 17:43, 20 June 2022

Trusting the priesthood [∞]

Discussion

Greeks trust the 'priesthood' or self-appointed experts. Scholars quote others scholars endlessly, and it would seem that their invented issues solved by their doctoral theses naming each other, wend themselves into the mythology of the church.

The debates concerning 'sensus plenior' during the last century concluded with a whimpering confession that they could not read the Old Testament the way the Jesus and the NT authors did; wondering if they would ever understand. Can you trust those who admit that they cannot read the Bible properly? How did they become the priests of Evangelicalism? A prominent 'theologian' from Dallas said, while refusing to look, "I will not look at something that is not there, when presented with evidence of the mystery. [1]
  1. ↑ ▸ ± Pr 18:13 He that answereth a matter before he heareth [it], it [is] folly and shame unto him. [{answereth … : Heb. returneth a word }]

Here we say that all are under the scrutiny of scripture and the rules for interpretation[1]. Scholars are not apostles! [2] But even a child may challenge an interpretation under the rules. [3] [4] [5]

  1. ↑ Rules for interpretation
  2. ↑ ▸ ± 1Co 1:27 But God hath chosen the foolish things of the world to confound the wise; and God hath chosen the weak things of the world to confound the things which are mighty;
  3. ↑ {▸ ± Isa 11:6 The wolf also shall dwell with the lamb, and the leopard shall lie down with the kid; and the calf and the young lion and the fatling together; and a little child shall lead them.
  4. ↑ ▸ ± Mr 10:15 Verily I say unto you, Whosoever shall not receive the kingdom of God as a little child, he shall not enter therein.
  5. ↑ ▸ ± Lu 18:17 Verily I say unto you, Whosoever shall not receive the kingdom of God as a little child shall in no wise enter therein.
Retrieved from "https://2ndbook.org/w/index.php?title=Trusting_the_priesthood&oldid=716"