Trusting the priesthood: Difference between revisions

From 2nd Book
Jump to navigationJump to search
no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 5: Line 5:
:The debates concerning 'sensus plenior' during the last century concluded with a whimpering confession that they could not read the Old Testament the way the Jesus and the NT authors did; wondering if they would ever understand. Can you trust those who admit that the y cannot read the Bible properly? How did they become the priests of Evangelicalism? A prominent 'theologian' from Dallas said. "I will not look at something that is not there, when presented with evidence of the mystery. <ref>{{bgw|Pr 18:13}}  He that answereth a matter before he heareth [it], it [is] folly and shame unto him. [{answereth … : Heb. returneth a word }]</ref>
:The debates concerning 'sensus plenior' during the last century concluded with a whimpering confession that they could not read the Old Testament the way the Jesus and the NT authors did; wondering if they would ever understand. Can you trust those who admit that the y cannot read the Bible properly? How did they become the priests of Evangelicalism? A prominent 'theologian' from Dallas said. "I will not look at something that is not there, when presented with evidence of the mystery. <ref>{{bgw|Pr 18:13}}  He that answereth a matter before he heareth [it], it [is] folly and shame unto him. [{answereth … : Heb. returneth a word }]</ref>


Here we say that all are under the scrutiny of scripture and the [[rules for interpretation]].
Here we say that all are under the scrutiny of scripture and the rules for interpretation<ref>[[Rules for Interpretation]]</ref>.

Navigation menu